Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=873907
 
 

Citations (18)



 
 

Footnotes (274)



 


 



Fair Measures: A Behavioral Realist Revision of 'Affirmative Action'


Jerry Kang


University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law

Mahzarin R. Banaji


Harvard University - Department of Psychology; Harvard University - Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics


California Law Review, Vol. 94, pp. 1063-1118, 2006
University of California, Los Angeles - School of Law Research Paper No. 06-08

Abstract:     
New facts recently discovered in the mind and behavioral sciences have the potential to transform both lay and expert conceptions of affirmative action. Drawing on recent findings in implicit social cognition (ISC) and applying a legal methodology called behavioral realism, the authors advance four arguments. First, evidence of pervasive implicit bias allows us to avoid problematic backward- and forward-looking justifications for affirmative action and instead focus on addressing discrimination here and now. Second, evidence of biased interpretation and stereotype threat suggests that merit is currently being mismeasured, and that more accurate measurement processes should be adopted. Third, evidence of the malleability of implicit bias suggests interventions different from the traditional social contact hypothesis, such as deploying debiasing agents. Finally, instead of an arbitrary deadline, a better terminus for various affirmative action programs is when our society reaches alignment between explicit normative commitments and measures of implicit bias. Through this analysis of the legal and policy implications of cutting-edge social cognitive research, the authors shed the freighted term affirmative action and produce instead a scientific and normative common ground in favor of fair measures.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 56

Keywords: affirmative action, fair measures, implicit association test, IAT, social cognition, implicit bias, stereotype threat, role models, equal protection, Title VII, behavioral realism, behavioral law and economics, heuristics and biases,discrimination, merit, social contact hypothesis

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: January 7, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Kang, Jerry and Banaji, Mahzarin R., Fair Measures: A Behavioral Realist Revision of 'Affirmative Action'. California Law Review, Vol. 94, pp. 1063-1118, 2006; University of California, Los Angeles - School of Law Research Paper No. 06-08. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=873907

Contact Information

Jerry Kang (Contact Author)
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law ( email )
385 Charles E. Young Dr. East
Room 1242
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1476
United States
310-206-7298 (Phone)
310-206-7010 (Fax)
Mahzarin R. Banaji
Harvard University - Department of Psychology ( email )
33 Kirkland St.
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States
Harvard University - Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics ( email )
124 Mount Auburn Street
Suite 520N
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 8,150
Downloads: 1,224
Download Rank: 7,645
Citations:  18
Footnotes:  274

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.297 seconds