|
||||
|
||||
Congress and the political expansion of the U.S. districts courtsJohn M. De FigueiredoDuke University; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Gerald S. GryskiAuburn University - Department of Political Science Gary ZukAuburn University - Department of Political Science Emerson H. TillerNorthwestern University - School of Law American Law and Economics Review, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 107-125, 2000 Abstract: Expanding the number of U.S. district judgeships is often justified as a response to expanding caseloads. Increasing judgeships during unified government, however, allows Congress and the President to engage in political (patronage and ideological) control of the federal district courts. This paper examines empirically the relative importance of caseload pressure and political motives for Congress to expand the number of federal district judgeships. We demonstrate that politics dominates the timing of judgeship expansion in the U.S. District Courts. We also show that both politics and caseload affect the actual size of those timed expansions. In particular, we find that before 1970, Congress seemed to have strong political motivations for the size of an expansion. After 1970, Congress became much more attentive to caseload considerations. Accepted Paper Series Date posted: February 29, 2008Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.359 seconds