Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=875412
 
 

Citations (11)



 
 

Footnotes (286)



 


 



The Neglected Political Economy of Eminent Domain


Nicole Stelle Garnett


Notre Dame Law School


105 Michigan Law Review 102 (2006)
Notre Dame Legal Studies Paper No. 06-01

Abstract:     
This Article challenges a foundational assumption about eminent domain - namely, that owners are systematically undercompensated because they receive only fair market value for their property. The Article shows that, in fact, scholars have overstated the undercompensation problem because they have focused on the compensation required by the Constitution, rather than on the actual mechanics of eminent domain. The Article examines three ways that Takers (i.e., non-judicial actors in the eminent domain process) minimize undercompensation. First, Takers may avoid taking high-subjective-value properties. Second, Takers frequently must pay more compensation in the form of relocation assistance. Third, Takers and property owners may voluntarily settle on above-market compensation during pre-condemnation negotiations. The Article concludes by reflecting upon current efforts to reform eminent domain legislatively. Prominent legal scholars recently have proposed compensation-based reforms as an alternative to constraints on the use of eminent domain. The final Part rejects this suggestion, arguing that there are two problems, unique to takings raising public use questions, that more money cannot solve: First, high compensation levels may undermine political resistance to questionable projects; second, private takings may generate non-instrumental harms that will persist even as compensation increases.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 51

Keywords: public use, eminent domain, takings, compensation, economic development, Kelo

JEL Classification: H7, H70, K11, O1


Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: January 13, 2006 ; Last revised: May 21, 2016

Suggested Citation

Garnett, Nicole Stelle, The Neglected Political Economy of Eminent Domain. 105 Michigan Law Review 102 (2006); Notre Dame Legal Studies Paper No. 06-01. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=875412

Contact Information

Nicole Stelle Garnett (Contact Author)
Notre Dame Law School ( email )
P.O. Box 780
Notre Dame, IN 46556
United States
574-631-3091 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.nd.edu/faculty/facultypages/garnettn.html

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 5,797
Downloads: 918
Download Rank: 17,065
Citations:  11
Footnotes:  286

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.172 seconds