|
||||
|
||||
What Explains the Variation in Estimates of Labour Supply Elasticities?Michiel EversTinbergen Institute - Economics Ruud A. De MooijInternational Monetary Fund (IMF); CESifo (Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute for Economic Research); Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation Daniel J. Van VuurenCPB Netherlands Bureau of Economic Policy Analysis December 2005 Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute for Economic Research Working Paper Series No. 1633 Abstract: This paper performs a meta-analysis of empirical estimates of uncompensated labour supply elasticities. We find that much of the variation in elasticities can be explained by the variation in gender, participation rates, and country fixed effects. Country differences appear to be small though. There is no systematic impact of the model specification or marital status on reported elasticities. The decision to participate is more responsive than is the decision regarding hours worked. Even at the intensive margin, we find that the elasticity for women exceeds that for men. For men and women in the Netherlands, we predict an uncompensated labour supply elasticity of 0.1 and 0.5, respectively. These values are robust for alternative samples and specifications of the meta regression.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 28 Keywords: labour supply, meta-analysis, uncompensated elasticity JEL Classification: J22, H2 working papers seriesDate posted: January 18, 2006Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.484 seconds