What's at Stake in Transgender Discrimination as Sex Discrimination?
Anna R. Kirkland
University of Michigan at Ann Arbor - Women's Studies Program; University of Michigan at Ann Arbor - Department of Political Science; Princeton University
Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 83-111, Autumn 2006
A federal court recently held that discrimination against transsexuals is illegal sex discrimination under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. The linchpin of the ruling is the legal concept of sex stereotyping. Feminist legal theorists have celebrated cases protecting gender non-conformists from discrimination and harassment, but we have not yet fully evaluated what we get when we get legal protections based on stereotyping. How does the concept of the illegal sex stereotype govern sex discrimination law? What does it mean to enfold transgender discrimination into sex discrimination law without naming and describing it separately? Perhaps law can be used merely instrumentally, and so any route to a winning verdict is acceptable. But if law is constitutive of identities in important ways, perhaps even as it is also instrumental, then calling transgender discrimination sex discrimination will have significant consequences. This study takes stock of those political and legal implications, arguing that although the winning case is worth celebrating, it depends upon an untrustworthy jurisprudence.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 29
Keywords: sex discrimination, transgender discrimination, sex stereotyping, Title VIIAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: October 21, 2006
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo1 in 1.718 seconds