Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=878356
 
 

Footnotes (88)



 


 



Publishing Dissent


Arthur J. Jacobson


Cardozo Law School


Washington and Lee Law Review, Vol. 62, p. 1607, 2005
Cardozo Legal Studies Research Paper No. 150

Abstract:     
Judges in common law jurisdictions sign opinions and publish dissents (as well as concurrences). In civil law jurisdictions they do not. Every civil law opinion is per curiam, by the court, while per curiam opinions in common law are the exception. The origins of the difference are historical and institutional. But the history and institutions of either system both reflect and inform profound jurisprudential differences. Written for a symposium at Washington & Lee Law School on unpublished and de-published opinions, the essay examines the practice of dissent in three legal cultures and the absence of it in civil law culture. It explores the origins of the American practice in Marshall's Supreme Court at the beginning of the nineteenth century.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 39

Keywords: dissent, concurrence, opinion, common law, civil law, ius commune, halakhah, Marshall, William Johnson

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: January 27, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Jacobson, Arthur J., Publishing Dissent. Washington and Lee Law Review, Vol. 62, p. 1607, 2005; Cardozo Legal Studies Research Paper No. 150. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=878356

Contact Information

Arthur J. Jacobson (Contact Author)
Cardozo Law School ( email )
55 Fifth Ave.
New York, NY 10003
United States
212-790-0218 (Phone)
212-790-0205 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 995
Downloads: 172
Download Rank: 101,518
Footnotes:  88

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.297 seconds