|
||||
|
||||
Wild Card Statutes, Parity, and National Banks - The Renascence of State Banking Powers
Christian A. Johnson University of Utah College of Law Loyola University Chicago Law Journal, Vol. 26, No. 3, p. 351-379, 1995 Abstract: The United States has a dual banking system in which banks can be charted either as a National Bank under the National Bank Act or a State Bank under any one of fifty different state banking laws. State Banks have often led the way in banking innovations and developing new approaches for regulating and examining financial institutions. However, in the past decade, State Banks have experienced difficulties in remaining competitive with National Banks, primarily because of the increasingly broad powers granted to National Banks by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. Some states have responded by enacting "wild card" or "parity" statutes that enable a state banking regulator to grant a State Bank the same banking powers enjoyed by a National Bank. However, neither state legislators nor regulators have taken full advantage of the wild card statutes. This article proposes that judicious use of "wild card" statutes would provide state banking regulators with the powers necessary to enable their State Banks to compete on an equal footing with National Banks without endangering the institutions' safety and soundness.
Keywords: banking regulation, bank, bank statute, bankings system, financial institutions JEL Classifications: E60,E61,E62,G21,G28 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: January 31, 2006 ; Last revised: February 05, 2006Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo 2 in 0.109 seconds.