Foreign Exchange Intervention in Developing and Transition Economies: Results of a Survey
59 Pages Posted: 29 Jan 2006
Date Written: May 2003
Abstract
Based on evidence obtained from the IMF`s 2001 Survey on Foreign Exchange Market Organization, the author argues that, for several reasons, some central banks in developing and transition economies may be able to conduct foreign exchange intervention more effectively than the central banks of developed countries issuing the major international currencies. First, these central banks do not always fully sterilize their foreign exchange interventions. In addition, they issue regulations and conduct their foreign exchange operations in a way that increases the central bank`s information advantage and the size of their foreign exchange intervention relative to foreign exchange market turnover. Some of the central banks also use moral suasion to support their foreign exchange interventions.
Keywords: Foreign exchange intervention, foreign exchange market microstructure, foreign exchange net open positions, foreign exchange regulation
JEL Classification: E58, F31, G28
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Official Intervention in the Foreign Exchange Market: Is it Effective, and, If so, How Does it Work?
By Mark P. Taylor and Lucio Sarno
-
By Gabriele Galati and William R. Melick
-
U.S. Intervention: Assessing the Probability of Success
By Owen Humpage
-
Does Central Bank Intervention Increase the Volatility of Foreign Exchange Rates?
-
Is Foreign Exchange Intervention Effective?: The Japanese Experiences in the 1990s
-
Does Foreign Exchange Intervention Signal Future Monetary Policy?
By Graciela Kaminsky and Karen K. Lewis
-
The Practice of Central Bank Intervention: Looking Under the Hood
-
Is Sterilized Foreign Exchange Intervention Effective after All? An Event Study Approach
By Rasmus Fatum and Michael M. Hutchison