Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=880080
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (65)



 


 



Roper v. Simmons and the Limits of the Adjudicatory Process


Daniel R. Williams


affiliation not provided to SSRN


Michigan State Law Review, Vol. 1, 2005
Northeastern University School of Law Research Paper No. 07-2006

Abstract:     
In Roper v. Simmons, the Supreme Court held that executing juvenile offenders is cruel and unusual punishment. The opinion's analysis borrows much from Atkins v. Virginia, where the Court barred executions of mentally retarded offenders. But Roper seems vulnerable as an exemplification of judicial fiat, since what we have in Roper is a rather crude basis for categorically exempting a class of offenders from capital punishment. The lasting legacy of Roper rests with the way the Eighth Amendment embraces a risk assessment of the adjudicatory process, which puts Roper in the company of Miranda and Gideon, where a similar sort of risk assessment takes place. Roper ultimately is a case about the limits of the adjudicatory process, and that reading of Roper may point the way to the ultimate undoing of capital punishment.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 23

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: February 5, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Williams, Daniel R., Roper v. Simmons and the Limits of the Adjudicatory Process. Michigan State Law Review, Vol. 1, 2005; Northeastern University School of Law Research Paper No. 07-2006. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=880080

Contact Information

Daniel R. Williams (Contact Author)
affiliation not provided to SSRN
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,149
Downloads: 124
Download Rank: 136,301
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  65

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.501 seconds