Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=880734
 
 

Citations (6)



 
 

Footnotes (182)



 


 



How American Workers Lost the Right to Strike, and Other Tales


James Gray Pope


Rutgers Law School - Newark

2005

Michigan Law Review, Vol. 103, pp. 518-53, 2005
Rutgers School of Law-Newark Research Paper No. 009

Abstract:     
As a veteran labor scholar once said, if you want to know where the corpses are buried in labor law, look for the of course statements in court opinions. This essay traces the historical origins of five such of course statements, each of which has had a devastating impact on the American labor movement. The five statements are: (1) Workers have no right of self-defense against employers that commit unfair labor practices (NLRB v. Fansteel Metallurgical Corporation); (2) Employers enjoy the right permanently to replace economic strikers (NLRB v. Mackay Radio & Telegraph Company); (3) The National Labor Relations Board has no power to deter unfair labor practices (Consolidated Edison Company v. NLRB); (4) Employers may exclude union organizers from their property (Lechmere, Inc. v. NLRB); (5) Employers may close operations out of spite against workers who choose to unionize (Textile Workers Union v. Darlington Manufacturing Company). The essay argues that in each of the five cases, the Court revived Lochner-era constitutional doctrines - supposedly defunct since the switch in time that saved nine in 1937 - and applied them to cut back on statutory labor rights. Although the five statements were not considered especially dangerous at the time, their impact has since been magnified by social and economic change. Taken together, they may account for a substantial proportion of the decline in the American labor movement. As in the pre-New Deal period, then, judges have deprived workers of the rights to organize and strike based on constitutional concerns. This time, however, they have avoided the forthright constitutional reasoning of the pre-1937 period, thereby insulating their rulings against changes in constitutional jurisprudence.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 37

Keywords: labor, strikes, economic due process

JEL Classification: K31

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 3, 2006 ; Last revised: June 7, 2009

Suggested Citation

Pope, James Gray, How American Workers Lost the Right to Strike, and Other Tales (2005). Michigan Law Review, Vol. 103, pp. 518-53, 2005; Rutgers School of Law-Newark Research Paper No. 009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=880734

Contact Information

James Gray Pope (Contact Author)
Rutgers Law School - Newark ( email )
123 Washington Street
Newark, NJ 07102
United States
973-744-3642 (Phone)
973-353-1445 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,244
Downloads: 320
Download Rank: 52,641
Citations:  6
Footnotes:  182

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.250 seconds