The Market for Illegal Goods: The Case of Drugs
Gary S. Becker
University of Chicago - Department of Economics; University of Chicago - Booth School of Business
Kevin M. Murphy
University of Chicago; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), NY Office; City University of New York Graduate Center
Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 114, pp. 38-60, February 2006
Revista de Economía Institucional, Vol. 8, No. 15, 2006
This paper considers the costs of reducing consumption of goods by making their production illegal and punishing illegal producers. We use illegal drugs as a prominent example. We show that the more inelastic either demand for or supply of goods is, the greater the increase in social cost from further reducing its production by greater enforcement efforts. So, optimal public expenditures on the apprehension and conviction of illegal suppliers depend not only on the difference between the social and private values of consumption, but also on this elasticity. When demand and supply are no so elastic, it does not pay to enforce any prohibition unless the social value is negative. We also show that a monetary tax could cause a greater reduction in output and increase in price than optimal enforcement against the same goods if it were illegal, even though some producers may go underground to avoid a monetary tax. When enforcement is costly, excise taxes and quantity restrictions are not equivalent.
Note: Downloadable document is in Spanish.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 26
Keywords: illegal goods, illegal producers, drugs, monetary tax, decriminalization, elasticity, social cost
JEL Classification: E26, H21, K42, L51
Date posted: February 7, 2006
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 1.296 seconds