The Persistence of Corruption and Slow Economic Growth
24 Pages Posted: 14 Feb 2006
Date Written: November 2002
Abstract
There is increasing recognition that corruption has substantial, adverse effects on economic growth. But if the costs of corruption are so high, why don't countries strive to improve their institutions and root out corruption? Why do many countries appear to be stuck in a vicious circle of widespread corruption and low economic growth, often accompanied by ever-changing governments through revolutions and coups? A possible explanation is that when corruption is widespread, individuals do not have incentives to fight it even if everybody would be better off without it. Two models involving strategic complementarities and multiple equilibria attempt to illustrate this formally.
Keywords: multiple equilibria, strategic complementarities, persistence, corruption
JEL Classification: K42, O17
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Why Do Some Countries Produce so Much More Output Per Worker than Others?
By Robert E. Hall and Charles I. Jones
-
Why Do Some Countries Produce so Much More Output Per Worker than Others?
By Robert E. Hall and Charles I. Jones
-
The Effects of Corruption on Growth, Investment, and Government Expenditure
By Paolo Mauro
-
The Allocation of Talent: Implications for Growth
By Kevin M. Murphy, Andrei Shleifer, ...
-
Human Capital, Fertility, and Economic Growth
By Gary S. Becker, Kevin M. Murphy, ...
-
By Robert E. Hall and Charles I. Jones
-
Good Policy or Good Luck? Country Growth Performance and Temporary Shocks
By William Easterly, Michael Kremer, ...