Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=881100
 
 

Citations (2)



 


 



Property Metaphors and Kelo v. New London: Two Views of the Castle


Eduardo M. Penalver


University of Chicago - Law School

February 3, 2006

Fordham Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 108

Abstract:     
Much of the popular outcry against the Supreme Court's decision in Kelo v. New London can be understood in terms of the public's commitment to the conception of the home as a castle. This familiar metaphor is typically viewed as aligned with libertarian conceptions of property and of the right to exclude. Taken to its logical conclusion, the metaphor's connotation of an owner's "absolute dominion" would seem to rule out the exercise of eminent domain altogether. A different understanding of the castle metaphor is possible, however, one rooted in notions of the dignity of home ownership. While such a dignitary understanding of the home as the castle remains true to the intuitions underlying the metaphor, it yields a far more flexible stance towards eminent domain.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 6

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 6, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Penalver, Eduardo M., Property Metaphors and Kelo v. New London: Two Views of the Castle (February 3, 2006). Fordham Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 108. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=881100 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.881100

Contact Information

Eduardo Moises Penalver (Contact Author)
University of Chicago - Law School ( email )
1111 E. 60th St.
Chicago, IL 60637
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,892
Downloads: 246
Download Rank: 70,554
Citations:  2

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.219 seconds