Citations (2)



Property Metaphors and Kelo v. New London: Two Views of the Castle

Eduardo M. Penalver

Cornell University - Law School

February 3, 2006

Fordham Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 108

Much of the popular outcry against the Supreme Court's decision in Kelo v. New London can be understood in terms of the public's commitment to the conception of the home as a castle. This familiar metaphor is typically viewed as aligned with libertarian conceptions of property and of the right to exclude. Taken to its logical conclusion, the metaphor's connotation of an owner's "absolute dominion" would seem to rule out the exercise of eminent domain altogether. A different understanding of the castle metaphor is possible, however, one rooted in notions of the dignity of home ownership. While such a dignitary understanding of the home as the castle remains true to the intuitions underlying the metaphor, it yields a far more flexible stance towards eminent domain.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 6

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: February 6, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Penalver, Eduardo M., Property Metaphors and Kelo v. New London: Two Views of the Castle (February 3, 2006). Fordham Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 108. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=881100 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.881100

Contact Information

Eduardo Moises Penalver (Contact Author)
Cornell University - Law School ( email )
Myron Taylor Hall
Cornell University
Ithaca, NY 14853-4901
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,239
Downloads: 252
Download Rank: 90,470
Citations:  2

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.234 seconds