Abstract

 
 

References (15)



 
 

Citations (5)



 


 



Superstars or Average Joes? A Replication-Based Performance Evaluation of 1917 Individual Hedge Funds


Harry M. Kat



Helder P. Palaro



February 3, 2006

Alternative Investment Research Centre Working Paper No. 30
Cass Business School Research Paper

Abstract:     
In this paper we use the hedge fund return replication technique recently introduced by Kat and Palaro (2005) to evaluate the net-of-fee performance of 1917 individual hedge funds. Comparing fund returns with the returns on dynamic futures trading strategies with the same risk and dependence characteristics, we find that no more than 17.7% of the hedge funds in our sample beat the benchmark. In other words, the majority of hedge funds have not provided their investors with returns, which they could not have generated themselves by mechanically trading S&P 500, T-bond and Eurodollar futures. Over time, we observe a substantial deterioration in overall hedge fund performance. In addition, we find a tendency for the performance of successful funds to deteriorate over time, which supports the hypothesis that increasing assets under management endanger future performance.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 30

Keywords: Hedge funds, performance evaluation, return replication

JEL Classification: G10, G13, G23

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 7, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Kat, Harry M. and Palaro, Helder P., Superstars or Average Joes? A Replication-Based Performance Evaluation of 1917 Individual Hedge Funds (February 3, 2006). Alternative Investment Research Centre Working Paper No. 30; Cass Business School Research Paper. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=881105 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.881105

Contact Information

No contact information is available for Harry M. Kat
No contact information is available for Helder P. Palaro
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 8,684
Downloads: 2,434
Download Rank: 2,033
References:  15
Citations:  5

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.703 seconds