|
||||
|
||||
The Importance of Default Options for Retirement Savings Outcomes: Evidence from the United States
John Beshears National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); Harvard University - Department of Economics James J. Choi Yale School of Management; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) David Laibson Harvard University - Department of Economics; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Brigitte C. Madrian Harvard University - John F. Kennedy School of Government; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) February 2006 NBER Working Paper No. W12009 Abstract: This paper summarizes the empirical evidence on how defaults impact retirement savings outcomes. After outlining the salient features of the various sources of retirement income in the U.S., the paper presents the empirical evidence on how defaults impact retirement savings outcomes at all stages of the savings lifecycle, including savings plan participation, savings rates, asset allocation, and post-retirement savings distributions. The paper then discusses why defaults have such a tremendous impact on savings outcomes. The paper concludes with a discussion of the role of public policy towards retirement saving when defaults matter. Institutional subscribers to the NBER working paper series, and residents of developing countries may download this paper without additional charge at www.nber.org. Working Paper Series Date posted: April 22, 2006 ; Last revised: July 02, 2009Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo1 in 0.156 seconds.