Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=881857
 
 

Footnotes (65)



 


 



Age, Tenure and Productivity of the U.S. Supreme Court: Are Term Limits Necessary?


Joshua C. Teitelbaum


Georgetown University Law Center


Florida State University Law Review, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 161-181, 2006

Abstract:     
This paper examines the relationship between the productivity of the U.S. Supreme Court and the age and tenure of the Supreme Court Justices. The motivation for this paper is the Supreme Court Renewal Act of 2005 (SCRA) and other recent proposals to impose term limits for Supreme Court Justices. The authors of the SCRA and others suggest that term limits are necessary because, inter alia, increased longevity and terms of service of the Justices has resulted in a decline in the productivity of the Court as measured by the number of cases accepted for review and the number of opinions issued per term. On the whole, the empirical findings of this paper do not provide clear support for this assertion.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 22

Keywords: age, tenure, productivity, Supreme Court, term limits

JEL Classification: K40

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: February 9, 2006 ; Last revised: September 13, 2012

Suggested Citation

Teitelbaum, Joshua C., Age, Tenure and Productivity of the U.S. Supreme Court: Are Term Limits Necessary?. Florida State University Law Review, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 161-181, 2006. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=881857

Contact Information

Joshua C. Teitelbaum (Contact Author)
Georgetown University Law Center ( email )
600 New Jersey Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20001
United States
202-661-6589 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,347
Downloads: 150
Download Rank: 116,736
Footnotes:  65

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.281 seconds