Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=883692
 
 

Citations



 


 



On the Writing and the Interpretation of Contracts


Steven Shavell


Harvard Law School; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)


Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Vol. 22, No. 2, Fall 2006
Harvard Law and Economics Discussion Paper No. 445

Abstract:     
The major theme of this article is that the interpretation of contracts is in the interests of contracting parties. The general reasons are (a) that interpretation may improve on otherwise imperfect contracts; and (b) that the prospect of interpretation allows parties to write simpler contracts and thus to conserve on contracting effort. A method of interpretation is defined as a function whose argument is the written contract and whose value is another contract, the interpreted contract, which is what actually governs the parties' joint enterprise. It is shown that interpretation is superior to enforcement of contracts as written, and the optimal method of interpretation is analyzed.

JEL Classification: D00, D8, K12

Accepted Paper Series





Not Available For Download

Date posted: February 23, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Shavell, Steven, On the Writing and the Interpretation of Contracts. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Vol. 22, No. 2, Fall 2006; Harvard Law and Economics Discussion Paper No. 445. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=883692

Contact Information

Steven Shavell (Contact Author)
Harvard Law School ( email )
1575 Massachusetts
Hauser 406
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States
617-495-3668 (Phone)
617-496-2256 (Fax)
National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
1050 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 793

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.313 seconds