Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=88548
 
 

References (26)



 
 

Footnotes (8)



 


 



The CAPM vs. the Fama and French Three-Factor Pricing Model: A Comparison Using Value Line Investment Survey


David M. Porras


Quincy University

March 24, 1998


Abstract:     
The CAPM and Fama and French (FF) three-factor pricing model are subjected to a series of tests using out of sample data, free from many of the biases present in typical testing. Data is collected from the Value Line Investment Survey allowing for survivorship and look-ahead biases to be eliminated. Further, it is argued that simple portfolio selection rules and the use of data from a source commonly consulted by investors minimizes data snooping concerns. Stronger support is found for the CAPM than that reported by FF (1992, 1996). Size and book-to-market equity (B/M) are insignificant in cross-sectional regressions, and Gibbons, Ross, and Shanken (1989) F-tests cannot reject the appropriateness of the CAPM when stocks are sorted into size and B/M portfolios. Beta, on the other hand, emerges as a powerful anomaly. Neither the CAPM nor the FF model can explain the high (low) returns on low (high) beta portfolios.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 33

JEL Classification: G12

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 16, 1998  

Suggested Citation

Porras, David M., The CAPM vs. the Fama and French Three-Factor Pricing Model: A Comparison Using Value Line Investment Survey (March 24, 1998). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=88548 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.88548

Contact Information

David M. Porras (Contact Author)
Quincy University ( email )
1800 College Avenue
Quincy, IL 62301-2699
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 9,143
Downloads: 2,709
Download Rank: 2,039
References:  26
Footnotes:  8

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.360 seconds