CEO Turnover and Relative Performance Evaluation
Stanford Graduate School of Business; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Sloan School of Management
May 1, 2008
Stanford University Graduate School of Business Research Paper No. 1992
MIT Sloan Research Paper No. 4594-06
Rock Center for Corporate Governance Working Paper No. 24
This paper examines whether CEOs are fired after bad firm performance caused by factors beyond their control. Standard economic theory predicts that corporate boards filter out exogenous industry and market shocks from firm performance before deciding on CEO retention. Using a new hand-collected sample of 1,627 CEO turnovers from 1993 to 2001, we document that CEOs are significantly more likely to be dismissed from their jobs after bad industry or bad market performance. A decline in the industry component of firm performance from its 75th to its 25th percentile increases the probability of a forced CEO turnover by approximately 50 percent. This result is at odds with the prior empirical literature, which showed that corporate boards filter exogenous shocks from CEO dismissal decisions in samples from the 1970s and 1980s. Our findings suggest that the standard CEO turnover model is too simple to capture the empirical relation between performance and forced CEO turnovers, and we evaluate several extensions to the standard model.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 76
Keywords: CEO Turnover, Performance Evaluation, Corporate Boards
JEL Classification: G30, G34, D20, D23, M51working papers series
Date posted: February 17, 2006 ; Last revised: August 18, 2011
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.375 seconds