|
||||
|
||||
The Economics of Treaty RatificationVincy FonGeorge Washington University - Department of Economics Francesco ParisiUniversity of Minnesota - Law School; University of Bologna February 21, 2006 George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 06-02 Journal of Law, Economics and Policy, Forthcoming Abstract: In this paper we study the strengths and weaknesses of the matching-reservations mechanism introduced by Article 21 of the Vienna Convention. When states face asymmetric incentives, the rules introduced by the Vienna Convention may not discourage all reservations. We also analyze the welfare properties of the matching-reservations outcomes generated by Article 21 when such asymmetric incentives are at work. We show that Article 21 provides quite an effective solution to the prisoner's dilemma problem, but does not always induce socially optimal levels of ratification. A social optimum will be achieved under Article 21 only in the limited subset of cases where signatory states have homogeneous payoff functions, or when all states prefer full ratification, despite the differences in the incentives that they face.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 21 Keywords: Reservations, Treaty ratification, Vienna Convention JEL Classification: D70, K10, K33 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: February 21, 2006 ; Last revised: September 8, 2008Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.375 seconds