Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=886304
 
 

Citations (2)



 


 



What's So Bad about Unilateral Action to Protect the Environment?


Daniel Bodansky


Arizona State University Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law


European Journal of International Law, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 339-348, 2000

Abstract:     
National actions to protect the environment can be more or less unilateral, ranging from those that promote purely national policies at one extreme to those that promote international norms at the other. Although the preference for international action to protect the environment is understandable, sometimes unilateral action can play a catalytic role in the development of an environmental regime. Moreover, often effective multilateral action is impossible, so the choice is not between unilateralism and multilateralism but between unilateralism and inaction. Rather than condemning unilateral action outright, we need to evaluate each particular unilateral action (or inaction) to determine whether it advances or detracts from desired ends.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 9

Keywords: international law, environment, unilateralism, multilateralism

JEL Classification: K32, K33

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: March 1, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Bodansky, Daniel, What's So Bad about Unilateral Action to Protect the Environment?. European Journal of International Law, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 339-348, 2000. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=886304

Contact Information

Daniel Bodansky (Contact Author)
Arizona State University Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law ( email )
Box 877906
Tempe, AZ 85287-7906
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,032
Downloads: 177
Download Rank: 101,602
Citations:  2

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.484 seconds