Abstract

 


 



Regulatory Reform: The New Lochnerism?


David M. Driesen


Syracuse University - College of Law

February 24, 2006


Abstract:     
This article explores the question of whether contemporary regulatory reformers' attitudes toward government regulation have anything in common with those of the Lochner-era Court. It finds that both groups tend to favor value-neutral law guided by cost-benefit analysis over legislative value choices. Their skepticism toward redistributive legislation reflects shared beliefs that regulation often proves counterproductive in terms of its own objectives, fails demanding tests for rationality, and violates the natural order. This parallelism raises fresh questions about claims of neutrality and heightened rationality that serve as important justifications for modern regulatory reform.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 57

Keywords: Lochner era, Lochnerism, regulatory reform, Cost-benefit analysis, environmental law, natural law, judicial activism

JEL Classification: D61, D73, I18, K32, K23, K12

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 27, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Driesen, David M., Regulatory Reform: The New Lochnerism? (February 24, 2006). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=886710 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.886710

Contact Information

David M. Driesen (Contact Author)
Syracuse University - College of Law ( email )
E.I. White Hall
Syracuse, NY 13244-1030
United States
315-443-4218 (Phone)
315-443-4141 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.syr.edu/faculty/facultymember.asp?fac=12
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,000
Downloads: 111
Download Rank: 83,318

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.469 seconds