Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=887420
 
 

Citations (3)



 
 

Footnotes (383)



 


 



Artful Prior Art and the Quality of DNA Patents


Andrew Chin


University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill - School of Law


Alabama Law Review, Vol. 57, 2006
UNC Legal Studies Research Paper No. 06-4

Abstract:     
In reviewing patent applications and prior art references in biotechnology, the patent system often focuses on the extent to which these documents explicitly disclose structural formulae for specific nucleic acid molecules. This Article argues that this approach to patentability has caused well-known generic and methodological references to be disregarded as potentially relevant prior art. To provide empirical support for this doctrinal argument, this Article also describes the creation and publication of an "artfully drafted" prior art reference that provides an enabling disclosure of more than 11 million DNA sequences on CD-ROM and has already been cited in a number of patents and patent applications. The reference is still too small to offer a complete solution to the problems caused by the patent system's approach. Because the size of the reference is constrained only by the capacity of the CD-ROM, however, the reference provides a "proof of concept" that may be generalized and extended as more capacious storage media become available.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 61

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 3, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Chin, Andrew, Artful Prior Art and the Quality of DNA Patents. Alabama Law Review, Vol. 57, 2006; UNC Legal Studies Research Paper No. 06-4. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=887420

Contact Information

Andrew Chin (Contact Author)
University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill - School of Law ( email )
Van Hecke-Wettach Hall
100 Ridge Road
Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3380
United States
919-962-4116 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,491
Downloads: 142
Download Rank: 118,799
Citations:  3
Footnotes:  383
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.265 seconds