Facial Challenges, Legislative Purpose, and the Commerce Clause
David L. Franklin
DePaul University - College of Law
Iowa Law Review, Vol. 92, p. 41, 2006
Over the past decade or so, the Supreme Court has issued an extraordinary and highly controversial series of decisions concerning the scope of Congress's power. Yet beneath the surface of the debate over the federalism cases lies a parallel dispute that has received far less scholarly notice. This dispute concerns the proper mode of judicial review in cases testing the scope of congressional power. The uncertainty is greatest in the Commerce Clause area, where the Court's recent casesincluding its 2005 decision in Gonzales v. Raichhave shown a strong preference for facial challenges, in sharp contrast to the Court's traditional inclination toward as-applied review. This Article explores several possible rationales for the Court's use of facial review in Commerce Clause cases and concludes that the soundest explanation lies in an understanding of the Clause's meaning that incorporates a requirement of appropriate legislative purpose.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 63
Keywords: Constitution, Constitutional Law, Commerce Clause, facial challenges, as-applied challenges, legislative purpose, Gonzales v. Raich
JEL Classification: K10, K19Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: March 6, 2006
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.359 seconds