Abstract

 
 

References (15)



 


 



Junk Forecasts in the Courtroom?: Assessing the 'S-Curve' Approach to Calculating Damages


Jonathan Tomlin


Navigant Economics

C. Paul Wazzan


LECG, LLC

December 19, 2005


Abstract:     
In their role as "gatekeepers," the courts are often faced with the issue of assessing the reliability of complex expert testimony in a variety of disciplines. In the area of finance and economics, two recent federal decisions concluded that the "S-curve" approach, which has been described as a method "gaining popularity" among experts, was unreliable. We demonstrate the susceptibility of the "S-curve" approach to manipulation by empirically testing several "S-curve" derived models on a sample of over 2,900 firms. We also explain why the literature on this method does not provide proper foundations for calculating damages in litigation. We conclude that recent assessments of the "S-curve" demonstrate a proper application of the "gatekeeping" role of the courts.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 25

Keywords: S curve, S-curve, lost profits, damages

JEL Classification: K00, K20, K41

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 5, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Tomlin, Jonathan and Wazzan, C. Paul, Junk Forecasts in the Courtroom?: Assessing the 'S-Curve' Approach to Calculating Damages (December 19, 2005). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=887606 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.887606

Contact Information

Jonathan Tomlin (Contact Author)
Navigant Economics ( email )
300 South Grand Avenue
29th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
United States
310-670-3200 (Phone)
Christopher Paul Wazzan
LECG, LLC ( email )
2000 Powell Street, Suite 600
Emeryville, CA 94608
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,311
Downloads: 204
Download Rank: 74,126
References:  15

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.578 seconds