The Case for Limited Shareholder Voting Rights
Stephen M. Bainbridge
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law
UCLA Law Review, Vol. 53, pp. 601-636, 2006
UCLA School of Law, Law-Econ Research Paper No. 06-07
Recent years have seen a number of efforts to extend the shareholder franchise. These efforts implicate two fundamental issues for corporation law. First, why do shareholders - and only shareholders - have voting rights? Second, why are the voting rights of shareholders so limited? This essay proposes answers for those questions.
As for efforts to expand the limited shareholder voting rights currently provided by corporation law, the essay argues that the director primacy-based system of U.S. corporate governance has served investors and society well. This record of success occurred not in spite of the separation of ownership and control, but because of that separation. Before changing making further changes to the system of corporate law that has worked well for generations, it would be appropriate to give those changes already made time to work their way through the system. To the extent additional change or reform is thought desirable at this point, surely it should be in the nature of minor modifications to the newly adopted rules designed to enhance their performance, or rather than radical and unprecedented shifts in the system of corporate governance that has existed for decades.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 37
Keywords: corporate governance, corporation law, shareholders, voting rights
JEL Classification: K22
Date posted: March 3, 2006
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.250 seconds