Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=888634
 


 



Game Over


Joshua C. Tate


Southern Methodist University - Dedman School of Law


Yale Law Journal, Vol. 109, pp. 1709-16, 2000

Abstract:     
In the case of Perlman v. Catapult Entertainment, the Ninth Circuit applied the hypothetical test regarding the assumability of patent licenses under Section 365(c) of the Bankruptcy Code. This Note argues that trustees should have recourse to the law of unjust enrichment when a debtor is unable to assume a patent license under the hypothetical test.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 8

Keywords: bankruptcy, debtor, executory contract, patent license

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 9, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Tate, Joshua C., Game Over. Yale Law Journal, Vol. 109, pp. 1709-16, 2000. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=888634

Contact Information

Joshua C. Tate (Contact Author)
Southern Methodist University - Dedman School of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 750116
Dallas, TX 75275
United States
(214) 768-2791 (Phone)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,627
Downloads: 87
Download Rank: 170,634

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.484 seconds