Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=888767
 
 

References (68)



 
 

Citations (4)



 


 



Claiming a Large Slice of a Small Pie: Asymmetric Disconfirmation in Negotiation


Richard P. Larrick


Duke University - Fuqua School of Business

George Wu


University of Chicago - Booth School of Business

December 2005


Abstract:     
Three studies show that negotiators consistently underestimate the size of the bargaining zone in distributive negotiations (the small pie bias) and, by implication, overestimate the share of the surplus they claim (the large slice bias). We explain the results by asymmetric disconfirmation: Negotiators with initial estimates of their counterpart's reservation price that are "inside" the bargaining zone tend to behave consistently with these estimates, which become self-fulfilling, whereas negotiators with initial "outside" estimates revise their perceptions in the face of strong disconfirming evidence. Asymmetric disconfirmation can produce a population-level bias even when initial perceptions are accurate on average. We suggest that asymmetric disconfirmation has implications for confirmation bias and self-fulfilling prophecy research in social perception.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 69

Keywords: confirmation bias, feedback, learning, negotiation, self-fulfilling prophecy, triangle hypothesis

JEL Classification: C70, C78, D74, D83

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 10, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Larrick, Richard P. and Wu, George, Claiming a Large Slice of a Small Pie: Asymmetric Disconfirmation in Negotiation (December 2005). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=888767 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.888767

Contact Information

Richard P. Larrick (Contact Author)
Duke University - Fuqua School of Business ( email )
Box 90120
Durham, NC 27708-0120
United States
HOME PAGE: http://www.fuqua.duke.edu/faculty/alpha/larrick.htm
George Wu
University of Chicago - Booth School of Business ( email )
5807 S. Woodlawn Avenue
Chicago, IL 60637
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,415
Downloads: 231
Download Rank: 72,833
References:  68
Citations:  4
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.562 seconds