The Forgotten Threat: Private Policing and the State
Elizabeth E. Joh
U.C. Davis School of Law
Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, Vol. 13, p. 357, 2006
What do Disneyland, the Abu Ghraib U.S. military prison, the Mall of America, and the Y-12 nuclear security complex in Oak Ridge, Tennessee have in common? They have wildly different purposes, but they share a common characteristic as employers of private police. This answer - indicative of the prevalence and numbers of private police today, would have struck the nineteenth century observer as evidence of a gross failure by the state. Yet that reaction, in turn, would seem odd to us. Vocal support of private police can be found among public police chiefs, lawmakers, and even with President Bush.
What kinds of criticisms were once leveled at private police by public officials? How did one attitude, deeply skeptical of private police, evolve into another that sees heavy reliance upon private policing as beneficial, or at least benign? This Article takes a fresh look at the dynamics of that change, and by doing so, restores to their proper place fundamental questions about the use of police who are privately financed and organized in a democratic society. These questions, and the violent history that midwived them, have been largely and undeservedly forgotten by the legal literature.
Using this historical perspective, this Article examines the shifting status of private policing: first, by examining the history of public criticism directed against them; second, by recounting the partnership model that first gained a foothold in studies sponsored by the federal government in the 1970s and 1980s; and third, by questioning the meaning and intentions behind the idea of partnership advanced today.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 34
Keywords: police, private police, legal history, privatization, state, labor historyAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: March 10, 2006 ; Last revised: June 25, 2013
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.265 seconds