SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (340)

Beta

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

Minority Report: John Marshall and the Defense of the Alien and Sedition Acts

Kurt T. Lash
Loyola Law School Los Angeles

Alicia Harrison
Loyola Law School


March 2006

Loyola-LA Legal Studies Paper No. 2006-11

Abstract:     
In 1799, the Federalist minority of the Virginia House of Delegates produced an extended defense of the Alien and Sedition Acts. This Minority Report responded to Madison's famous Virginia Resolutions and efforts by Virginia Republicans to tar the Adams Administration with having exceeded its powers under the federal Constitution. Originally attributed to John Marshall by biographer Albert Beveridge, recent biographies of Marshall have omitted the episode or rejected Beveridge's claim. The current editors of the Papers of John Marshall omitted the Minority Report from their multi-volume collection of Marshall's work and have successfully lobbied editors of similar collections to remove Marshall's name from the Report. What was once an assumed (if controversial) episode in Marshall's career has disappeared from otherwise exhaustive accounts of his life and work. As in Philip K. Dick's story, Minority Report, an alternate view of events has been unceremoniously erased from the official record.

The authors of this article challenge the decision to remove Marshall's name from the Minority Report. Marshall was the only person named at the time as the probable author, and Marshall had both reason and opportunity to draft the Address. The arguments of the Report not only track Marshall's views on the Constitution, they utilize constitutional arguments that were wholly unique at the time and would appear again, almost verbatim, in the future-Chief Justice's constitutional opinions. If Marshall penned this defense of the Acts, then this not only reveals the views of federal power he brought with him to the Supreme Court, it also helps illuminate public reaction to Chief Justice Marshall's nationalist jurisprudence. To his critics, Marshall's construction of federal power in McCulloch echoed the same arguments put forward to defend the hated Alien and Sedition Acts. The historical evidence suggests that not only were the arguments similar, they had flowed from the same pen.

Working Paper Series

Date posted: March 08, 2006 ; Last revised: March 19, 2007

Suggested Citation

Lash, Kurt T. and Harrison, Alicia, Minority Report: John Marshall and the Defense of the Alien and Sedition Acts (March 2006). Loyola-LA Legal Studies Paper No. 2006-11. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=888803


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Kurt T. Lash (Contact Author)
Loyola Law School Los Angeles ( email )
919 Albany Street
Los Angeles, CA 90015-1211
United States
(213) 736-1137 (Phone)
(213) 380-3769 (Fax)
Alicia Harrison
Loyola Law School ( email )
7900 Loyola Boulevard
Los Angeles, CA 90045
United States
213-736-1137 (Phone)
213-380-3769 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,265
Downloads: 191
Download Rank: 44,527
Footnotes: 340

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo3 in 0.110 seconds.