SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

Citations (1)

Beta

 
 

Footnotes (325)

Beta

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

The Normative Foundations of Trademark Law

Mark P. McKenna
Notre Dame Law School



Notre Dame Law Review, Vol. 82, 2007

Abstract:     
This paper challenges the conventional wisdom that trademark law traditionally sought to protect consumers and enhance marketplace efficiency. Contrary to widespread contemporary understanding, early trademark cases were decidedly producer-centered. Trademark infringement claims, like all unfair competition claims, were intended to protect producers from illegitimate attempts to divert their trade. Consumer deception was relevant in these cases only to the extent it was the means by which a competitor diverted a producer's trade. Moreover, American courts from the very beginning protected a party against improperly diverted trade in part by recognizing a narrow form ofproperty rights in trademarks. Those rights were derived from the natural rights theory of property that predominated in the nineteenth century and were defined quite narrowly.

Reframing traditional trademark law in this way leads to two important conclusions. First, although the broad forms of protection trademark law now provides deserve sustained scrutiny, any criticisms leveled against modern doctrines must stand on their own merits and fairly confront the policy goals of modern trademark law. The criticisms cannot draw their normative force by pointing to information transmission principles that did not animate traditional trademark law. Second, and somewhat counterintuitively, expansion of trademark law in the twentieth century was more a consequence of the modern search cost rationale than a deviation from that model. Traditional trademark law contained very specific and workable restrictions on the scope of trademark protection that were weakened or rejected in the twentieth century as courts and commentators embraced the information transmission model. The limitations counted on by proponents of the new model have proven almost infinitely pliable and have failed to halt trademark law's growth.

Keywords: Trademark, unfair competition, intellectual property, property, natural law

Accepted Paper Series

Date posted: March 16, 2006 ; Last revised: January 31, 2008

Suggested Citation

McKenna, Mark P., The Normative Foundations of Trademark Law. Notre Dame Law Review, Vol. 82, 2007. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=889162


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Mark P. McKenna (Contact Author)
Notre Dame Law School ( email )
P.O. Box 780
Notre Dame, IN 46556-0780
United States
(574) 631-9258 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,236
Downloads: 485
Download Rank: 14,889
Citations: 1
Footnotes: 325

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo7 in 0.109 seconds.