Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=889378
 
 

Citations (2)



 
 

Footnotes (221)



 


 



Removal and Tenure in Office


Saikrishna Prakash


University of Virginia School of Law


Virginia Law Review, Vol. 92, p. 1779, 2006
San Diego Legal Studies Paper No. 07-36

Abstract:     
Conventional wisdom supposes that the President enjoys a power to remove all presidentially appointed officers, save for judges. A corollary of this belief is that neither Congress nor the judiciary may remove such officers, for when the Constitution grants the President a power it often follows that no one else can enjoy that power. This article argues that these orthodoxies are false. First, contrary to the Court's hasty conclusion in Bowsher v. Synar, Congress can pass statutes that remove officers. Congress can terminate offices, thereby removing incumbent officers; it can set tenure limits for officers, thus mandating their eventual removal; and it can make removal a consequence of a criminal conviction. Most importantly, Congress can also pass statutes that directly remove officers. Second, the conventional wisdom overstates presidential removal authority in some respects while understating it in others. The accepted view overstates presidential power because it supposes that the President may remove all presidentially appointed officers. If the Constitution grants the President a distinct removal power, that power only encompasses executive officers. Any removal power would not extend to the quasi-legislative, quasi-judicial heads of the independent agencies. On the other hand, the orthodoxy arguably understates presidential power because it supposes that all executive officers must have tenure during pleasure. It may well be that the President may grant executive officers a more secure tenure, such as tenure during good behavior. Third, federal courts may remove all inferior judicial officers, however they were appointed. Each inferior judicial officer receives an implicit grant of authority from the court she serves. When a court withdraws all of its authority from an inferior judicial officer, the court has removed the officer. In this way, each branch may remove officers, albeit in different ways and to different degrees.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 54

Keywords: removal, tenure, officers, impeachment, president, congress

JEL Classification: K1, K2

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 9, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Prakash, Saikrishna, Removal and Tenure in Office. Virginia Law Review, Vol. 92, p. 1779, 2006; San Diego Legal Studies Paper No. 07-36. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=889378

Contact Information

Saikrishna Prakash (Contact Author)
University of Virginia School of Law ( email )
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,411
Downloads: 125
Download Rank: 116,258
Citations:  2
Footnotes:  221

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.234 seconds