Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=890303
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (91)



 


 



Why Enable Litigation?: A Positive Externalities Theory of the Small Claims Class Action


William B. Rubenstein


Harvard Law School


University of Missouri-Kansas City Law Review, Vol. 74, 2006
UCLA School of Law Research Paper No. 06-10

Abstract:     
This Article appears in a Symposium commemorating the Supreme Court's decision in Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Shutts. The legal claims that gave rise to Shutts were meritorious, yet of relatively modest value.

Individuals are unlikely to litigate such negative value claims because the costs of doing so outweigh the benefits they will receive; defendants are well-situated to escape liability. Conventionally, scholars describe this situation as posing a collective action problem and demonstrate how the class action mechanism works to solve that problem.

In this Article, I discuss the problem of negative value claims in a related yet distinct manner. The fact that parties will not pursue these claims is, I argue, an example of the underproduction of a so-called public good. That good is a lawsuit. Litigation can be conceptualized as a public good, with its pursuit producing positive externalities. The Article enumerates these collateral social benefits, grouping them as: 1) decree effects; 2) settlement effects; 3) threat effects; and 4) institutional effects.

The addition of this analysis to the scholarly literature serves several functions. Among these is that it illuminates how little collective action really takes places in small claims cases; how relatively unimportant the compensatory aspects of the case are compared to its other social functions; how the concept of deterrence does not capture these non-compensatory benefits as well as the concept of externalities does; and how small claims class actions are more like other types of class cases than generally presumed.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 23

Keywords: Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Shutts, class action suits, small claims class action

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: March 13, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Rubenstein, William B., Why Enable Litigation?: A Positive Externalities Theory of the Small Claims Class Action. University of Missouri-Kansas City Law Review, Vol. 74, 2006; UCLA School of Law Research Paper No. 06-10. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=890303

Contact Information

William B. Rubenstein (Contact Author)
Harvard Law School ( email )
1545 Massachusetts
Areeda 323
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States
617-496-7320 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.billrubenstein.com
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,262
Downloads: 310
Download Rank: 55,871
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  91

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.516 seconds