Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=890321
 
 

References (22)



 
 

Citations (31)



 


 



Monitoring the Monitor: Evaluating CalPERS' Activism


Brad M. Barber


University of California, Davis

November 2006


Abstract:     
Many public pension funds engage in institutional activism. These funds use the power of their pooled ownership of publicly traded stocks to affect changes in the corporations they own. I review the theory and empirical evidence underlying the motivation for institutional activism. In theory, the merits of institutional activism hinge critically on two agency costs: (1) the conflicts of interest between corporate managers and shareholders, and (2) the conflicts of interest between portfolio managers and investors. This leads to two types of institutional activism: shareholder activism and social activism. While portfolio managers can use their position to monitor conflicts that might arise between managers and shareholders (shareholder activism), they can also abuse their position by pursuing actions that advance their own moral values or political interests at the expense of investors (social activism). Which of these effects dominates the actions of portfolio managers will determine the value of activism and is an empirical issue. Perhaps the most high profile activism has been pursued by CalPERS with their annual focus list. I document that CalPERS has pursued reforms at focus list firms that would increase shareholder rights and (imprecisely) estimate the total wealth creation from this shareholder activism to be $3.1 billion between 1992 and 2005. Unrelated to the focus list program, CalPERS has also pursued social activism (e.g., the divestment of tobacco stocks). In general, I argue that institutional activism should be limited shareholder activism where there is strong theoretical and empirical evidence indicating the proposed reforms will increase shareholder value. At times, institutions will be forced to take engage in social activism and take positions on sensitive issues. In these situations, I argue portfolio managers should pursue the moral values or political interests of their investors rather than themselves.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 27

Keywords: shareholder activism, CalPERS, corporate governance, socially responsible investing

JEL Classification: G24, G30

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: March 24, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Barber, Brad M., Monitoring the Monitor: Evaluating CalPERS' Activism (November 2006). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=890321 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.890321

Contact Information

Brad M. Barber (Contact Author)
University of California, Davis ( email )
Graduate School of Management
One Shields Avenue
Davis, CA 95616
United States
530-752-0512 (Phone)
530-752-2924 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 7,729
Downloads: 1,980
Download Rank: 3,659
References:  22
Citations:  31

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.593 seconds