How Elected Judges Respond to the Racial Composition of their Constituencies

Abstract:     
We take advantage of the variation in the judicial selection system - some judges are appointed, while others are elected - to address how the racial composition of a district affects sentencing. We find that appointed and elected judges act differently, suggesting that bias in the way that the laws are written cannot explain the entire difference in sentencing between blacks and whites. We find that blacks are more likely to be incarcerated, and receive longer sentences, but this effect diminishes as the percentage of the population that is black rises for a black defendant facing an elected judge. A one standard deviation increase in blacks' share of county population is enough to obliterate the difference in sentence length.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 21

Keywords: discrimination, judicial selection, sentencing

JEL Classification: J15, J7, K14, K41

working papers series