'Too Big to Fail': Government Policy vs. Investor Perceptions
Todd A. Gormley
University of Pennsylvania - The Wharton School
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Entrepreneurship Center; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
Asian Development Bank
December 23, 2009
Can a “no bailout” government policy eliminate investors’ perception that some firms are “too big to fail”? We analyze this question using evidence from the Korean crisis of 1997-98. Despite a “no bailout” policy of Korean government following the crisis, we find that the largest Korean corporate groups (chaebol) were able to retain access to external finance by borrowing directly from households through the bond market. Dubious corporate governance did not prevent firms from borrowing, and there is no evidence that default risk was priced by investors. This evidence suggests that “too big to fail” beliefs among investors are unlikely to be eliminated by government commitments to not bail out firms.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 50
Keywords: Financial Development, Institutions, Economic Crisis
JEL Classification: E44, G18, K00, N20, P16, P17working papers series
Date posted: March 16, 2006 ; Last revised: June 30, 2011
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.422 seconds