Criminal Justice after the Conservative Reformation

Louis D. Bilionis

University of Cincinnati College of Law

Georgetown Law Journal, Vol. 94, p. 1347, 2006
U of Cincinnati Public Law Research Paper No. 06-07

This essay is part of a symposium asking whether there has been a significant change in direction in the Supreme Court's constitutional criminal justice jurisprudence recently. There indeed is a pronounced change. The forces that drove criminal justice toward a "conservative reformation" from the 1970s into the 1990s are now spent. The Court's challenge today is to maintain criminal justice's legitimacy in an environment driven by neither an overriding fear of crime nor a strong demand for further pro-prosecution conservative reform. In this new climate, other forces more conducive to affirming liberty in the liberty-versus-order equation can flow more freely. A redirection of criminal justice naturally follows.

In this new transitional period, three different dynamics operate to shape the Court's criminal justice jurisprudence. The first involves the Court's responsiveness to constitutional critiques of the justice system that have arisen from more-or-less grassroots levels. The second involves the occasional convergence of three different interpretive styles on the Supreme Court - an ecumenical internationalism reminiscent of the early 1960s, a generalizing of constitutional principles reminiscent of the late 1960s and early 1970s, and a textualist originalism popularized in the last fifteen years. The third dynamic involves the Court's effort to provide frameworks for dealing with the challenges that have arisen in the wake of the September 11 tragedies.

Each dynamic represents a resource to be tapped in the waging of law reform. Each also represents a different judicial function that regularly operates to shape constitutional law: the Court's obligation to respond to public critique, its obligation to seek synthesis within and across generations, and its obligation to provide frameworks for dealing with newly emerging constitutional challenges (and thereby contribute leadership that helps the other departments of the national government and the states).

Keywords: Criminal Justice Jurisprudence

JEL Classification: K14

Not Available For Download

Date posted: March 21, 2006 ; Last revised: May 30, 2010

Suggested Citation

Bilionis, Louis D., Criminal Justice after the Conservative Reformation. Georgetown Law Journal, Vol. 94, p. 1347, 2006; U of Cincinnati Public Law Research Paper No. 06-07. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=891413

Contact Information

Louis D. Bilionis (Contact Author)
University of Cincinnati College of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 210040
Cincinnati, OH 45221-0040
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,430

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.141 seconds