Undoing the Powerful Anti-Takeover Force of Staggered Boards
University of Illinois at Chicago - Department of Finance
Timothy A. Kruse
Xavier University - Department of Finance
Loyola University of Chicago
October 10, 2006
2nd Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies Paper
We examine cases where managers announce an intention to de-stagger their boards via proxy proposals or board action. The literature has established the staggered board as the most consequential of all takeover defenses and one that destroys wealth. Thus, dismantling this structure should create value. We study the wealth effects and motives behind this change in governance within a conditional event study. We find that de-staggering the board creates wealth and that shareholder activism is an important catalyst for pushing through this change. Moreover, investor reaction shows a perception that de-staggering firms are more likely to be takeover targets.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 45
Keywords: Staggered boards, Corporate governance, shareholder proposals
JEL Classification: G34working papers series
Date posted: March 19, 2006
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.719 seconds