Justice O'Connor and the 'Right to Die': Constitutional Promises Unfulfilled
Michael Patrick Allen
Stetson University - College of Law
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, Vol. 14, pp. 1-22, 2006
After nearly twenty-five years on the bench, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor left the Supreme Court at the end of January 2006. There has been much discussion of Justice O'Connor's decisions in areas such as federalism, the First Amendment's Establishment Clause, and affirmative action, among other topics. But very little has been written about her important role in the development of federal constitutional law concerning the "right to die."
This Essay seeks to fill this gap in the literature by exploring Justice O'Connor's important concurring opinions in Cruzan and Glucksberg. I argue that these opinions created constitutional promises of a sort that remain unfulfilled as Justice O'Connor retires. I also explain why this need not have been the case while highlighting the real world consequences of the failure to live up to the promises.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 22
Keywords: right to die, end of life decision-making, Justice O'Connor
JEL Classification: K19Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: March 26, 2006
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.500 seconds