References (230)


Citations (4)



Contract Law Theory

Brian Bix

University of Minnesota Law School

March 17, 2006

Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 06-12

This working paper is an early draft of two chapters (and the Preface and Bibliography) from a larger work on Contract Law (for the series, Cambridge Introductions to Philosophy and Law). The working paper covers the theory-focused part of the project. The paper analyzes what it means to have a theory of Contract, and what the criteria should be for evaluating such theories. The paper concludes that general or universal theories of Contract Law - at least those that have been presented to date (including economic theories of contract law, and deontological theories focusing on promising or autonomy) - cannot be justified, and we must seek instead to construct a theory that focuses on a particular legal system (or small group of legal systems), and that emphasizes the variety of principles and approaches within Contract Law, rather than seeking to find or impose a unity that does not exist.

In the course of the argument, the paper also touches on the role of history in explaining legal doctrine, voluntariness in contract formation, the moral obligation to keep contracts, and the relationship between rights and remedies.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 51

Keywords: Contract Law, Philosophical Foundations of the Common Law, Jurisprudence, Law and Economics

JEL Classification: K12

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: March 23, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Bix, Brian, Contract Law Theory (March 17, 2006). Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 06-12. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=892783 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.892783

Contact Information

Brian Bix (Contact Author)
University of Minnesota Law School ( email )
229 19th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55455
United States
612-624-2505 (Phone)
612-625-2011 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 14,600
Downloads: 3,359
Download Rank: 1,853
References:  230
Citations:  4

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.234 seconds