Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=894693
 
 

Citations (2)



 
 

Footnotes (258)



 


 



The Green Costs of Kelo: Economic Development Takings and Environmental Protection


Ilya Somin


George Mason University School of Law

Jonathan H. Adler


Case Western Reserve University School of Law; PERC - Property and Environment Research Center

April 2, 2006

Washington University Law Review, Vol. 84, No. 3, 2006, pp. 623-666
George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 06-10
Case Legal Studies Research Paper No. 06-07
PERC Research Paper No. 12/14

Abstract:     
This Article is the first academic paper to systematically consider the environmental impact of the Supreme Court's decision in Kelo v. City of New London and of economic development condemnations more generally. Kelo upheld economic development takings - condemnations that transfer property from one private owner to another solely on the ground that doing so might improve the local economy or increase tax revenue. The decision stands in sharp contrast to the Michigan Supreme Court's ruling in County of Wayne v. Hathcock, which forbade the use of eminent domain for economic development.

Part I briefly explains the rationales of the Kelo and Hathcock decisions and shows why a Hathcock-like ban on economic development takings is highly unlikely to impede environmental regulation or the use of eminent domain for legitimate conservation purposes. This doctrinal point is buttressed by empirical evidence indicating that none of the nine states with judicial bans on economic development takings have ever used such a ban to strike down the use of eminent domain for environmental or conservation purposes. Part II shows that economic development takings actually threaten environmental harm. Allowing the use of eminent domain for economic development poses a particular threat to private conservation lands and open space. Because land owned by conservation nonprofits produces few economic benefits and does not contribute to tax revenue, it is likely to be targeted by developers and local governments that use eminent domain to advance their development interests. Economic development takings can also damage the environment by promoting environmentally harmful development, undermining property rights, and furthering dubious development plans that sap community wealth and reduce resources available for environmental protection. In many situations, economic development takings end up giving us the worst of both worlds: they cause environmental harm and reduce economic growth by transferring land to inefficient development projects.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 47

Keywords: Kelo, eminent domain, environmental law, economic development, sprawl, Hathcock

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: April 4, 2006 ; Last revised: June 7, 2014

Suggested Citation

Somin, Ilya and Adler, Jonathan H., The Green Costs of Kelo: Economic Development Takings and Environmental Protection (April 2, 2006). Washington University Law Review, Vol. 84, No. 3, 2006, pp. 623-666; George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 06-10; Case Legal Studies Research Paper No. 06-07; PERC Research Paper No. 12/14. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=894693

Contact Information

Ilya Somin (Contact Author)
George Mason University School of Law ( email )
3301 Fairfax Drive
Arlington, VA 22201
United States
703-993-8069 (Phone)
703-993-8124 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://mason.gmu.edu/~isomin/
Jonathan H. Adler
Case Western Reserve University School of Law ( email )
11075 East Boulevard
Cleveland, OH 44106-7148
United States
216-368-2535 (Phone)
216-368-2086 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.jhadler.net
PERC - Property and Environment Research Center
2048 Analysis Drive
Suite A
Bozeman, MT 59718
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 5,869
Downloads: 699
Download Rank: 19,523
Citations:  2
Footnotes:  258

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.344 seconds