SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

References (9)

Beta

 
 

Citations (66)

Beta

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

On the Performance of Hedge Funds

Bing Liang
University of Massachusetts at Amherst - Department of Finance & Operations Management; China Academy of Financial Research (CAFR)


May 1998


Abstract:     
This paper investigates hedge fund performance and risk. The empirical evidence indicates that hedge funds differ substantially from traditional investment vehicles such as mutual funds. The funds with watermarks significantly outperform the funds without watermarks. The average hedge fund returns are related positively to incentive fees, the size of the fund, and the lockup period. Hedge funds follow dynamic trading strategies and have low systematic risk. There are low correlations among different strategies. Compared with mutual funds, hedge funds offer better risk-return trade-offs: they have higher Sharpe ratios, lower market risks, and higher abnormal returns. In the period of January 1994 to December 1996, hedge funds provide positive abnormal returns. Overall, hedge fund strategies dominate mutual fund strategies, hence hedge funds provide a more efficient investment opportunity set for investors.

JEL Classifications: G23, G11

Working Paper Series

Date posted: June 17, 1998 ; Last revised: September 11, 2009

Suggested Citation

Liang, Bing, On the Performance of Hedge Funds (May 1998). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=89490 or doi:10.2139/ssrn.89490


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Bing Liang (Contact Author)
University of Massachusetts at Amherst - Department of Finance & Operations Management ( email )
Amherst, MA 01003
United States
China Academy of Financial Research (CAFR)
1954 Huashan Road
Shanghai P.R.China, 200030 China

Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 9,233
Downloads: 3,140
Download Rank: 605
References: 9
Citations: 66

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was served by apollo6 in 0.125 seconds.