Abstract

 
 

Citations (4)



 


 



The Class Action Rule


John Bronsteen


Loyola University Chicago School of Law

Owen M. Fiss


Yale University - Law School


Notre Dame Law Review, Vol. 78, No. 5, pp. 1419-1454, 2003

Abstract:     
The class action is a compromise: It removes class members' right to participate in their own lawsuits, but it benefits society by holding defendants accountable for the dispersed harm they create. This compromise is captured by the idea that the named plaintiff's role is to represent the interests of the absent class members rather than to be their agent. Because the architecture of Rule 23 - the federal procedural rule that governs class actions - is inconsistent with the nature of the class action as a compromise based on interest representation, the rule should be altered dramatically. We would eliminate the core categorization scheme of 23(b) and apply limited notice, intervention, and opt-out rights to all class actions.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 36

Keywords: class action, Rule 23, interest representation, notice, intervention, opt-out

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 11, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Bronsteen, John and Fiss, Owen M., The Class Action Rule. Notre Dame Law Review, Vol. 78, No. 5, pp. 1419-1454, 2003. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=895093

Contact Information

John Bronsteen (Contact Author)
Loyola University Chicago School of Law ( email )
Chicago, IL 60611
United States
312-654-1511 (Phone)
312-915-7201 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.luc.edu/law/faculty/bronsteen.shtml

Owen M. Fiss
Yale University - Law School ( email )
P.O. Box 208215
New Haven, CT 06520-8215
United States

Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,158
Downloads: 342
Download Rank: 41,246
Citations:  4

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.609 seconds