Academic Discourse and Proprietary Rights: Putting Patents in their Proper Place
Margo A. Bagley
University of Virginia School of Law; Emory University School of Law
Boston College Law Review, Vol. 47, No. 1, 2006
Emory Public Law Research Paper No. 06-8
This Article provides a fresh perspective on the Bayh-Dole debate by focusing on the impact of patent novelty rules on academic discourse. The Article proposes that to begin to reverse an observed deterioration in disclosure norms, flexibilities must be built into the patent system so that patents can be facilitators of the academic knowledge dissemination enterprise. In particular, the Article advocates creation of an opt-in extended grace period which would provide more time for academic researchers to publish and present early stage research before having to file a patent application. Such an extension, coupled with early application publication, would both address third party needs for notice of proprietary claims and allow researchers to engage in traditional academic discourse while retaining the ability to obtain proprietary rights useful for commercialization of their inventions.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 58
Keywords: intellectual property, patents, grace period, technology transfer
JEL Classification: I19, K20, O34, O31Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: April 11, 2006
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.438 seconds