Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=895548
 
 

Citations (4)



 
 

Footnotes (328)



 


 



The Business Judgment Rule, Disclosure and Executive Compensation


D. A. Jeremy Telman


Valparaiso University Law School

March 3, 2006

Tulane Law Review, Vol. 81, 2007

Abstract:     
Despite its ubiquity in corporate law, the business judgment rule remains a doctrinal puzzle. Both courts and scholars offer different understandings of the Rule's role in litigation brought against corporate directors and different justifications for its deployment to insulate such directors from liability for breaches of fiduciary duties. This Article rejects all existing justifications for the Rule and argues that the Rule is no longer needed to protect directors from liability, either because the justifications offered never made any sense or because directors are now protected by other, statutory means. Rather, the Rule is needed today to protect not directors but the corporations they serve from the irreparable harm corporations would suffer if forced to disclose prospective business plans in order to defend decisions taken by their boards. This Article follows some recent scholarship in arguing that the Rule is best understood as an abstention doctrine and argues that courts should invoke the Rule and abstain from the review of the business judgment of corporate directors when the litigation that gives rise to such review would compel the corporation to disclose information relating to its prospective business plans. The Article then illustrates why the Rule should not apply in cases involving challenges to board decisions relating to executive compensation through a detailed discussion of the on-going litigation relating to the hiring and dismissal of the Walt Disney Company's former President, Michael Ovitz.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 61

JEL Classification: K22, G34, K49

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 13, 2006 ; Last revised: March 9, 2011

Suggested Citation

Telman, D. A. Jeremy, The Business Judgment Rule, Disclosure and Executive Compensation (March 3, 2006). Tulane Law Review, Vol. 81, 2007. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=895548

Contact Information

D.A. Jeremy Telman (Contact Author)
Valparaiso University Law School ( email )
656 S. Greenwich St.
Valparaiso, IN 46383-6493
United States
219-465-7811 (Phone)
219-465-7872 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.valpo.edu/law/faculty/jtelman/
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,697
Downloads: 325
Download Rank: 51,207
Citations:  4
Footnotes:  328

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.328 seconds