Lotus Eaters: Reflections on the Varietals Dispute, the SPS Agreement, and WTO Dispute Resolution
Jeffrey L. Dunoff
Temple University - James E. Beasley School of Law
Health Regulation in the WTO, Vol. 1, 2006
The Varietals dispute, which seemingly involves nothing other than a straight-forward application of the SPS Agreement, reveals surprisingly much about the function of WTO dispute settlement, the purposes of international trade law, as well as larger questions regarding both globalization and the status and scope of contemporary international law.
The paper examines, inter alia, whether the SPS Agreement unduly restricts states' ability to enact desirable social legislation and different methodological approaches to answering this question. It also discusses the appropriate role of panels and the Appellate Body in food safety and other controversial disputes that pit economic against non-economic interests.
Finally, as suggested by the title, the paper discusses the PCIJ's Lotus decision. Lotus implicitly assumes a world of independent states with few international rules governing their relations. In the Lotus universe, sovereignty is a paramount value, and states' freedom of action is jealously guarded. But the SPS Agreement and the Varietals dispute arise within a radically different legal environment, one where international legal norms proliferate and reach deeply within the domestic structure of the state. Varietals highlights the changing nature and functions of contemporary international law and some of the ways that the legal universe presupposed by the Lotus decision has been inverted.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 76
Keywords: GATT, WTO, trade, SPS, food safety, international trade, international law, international trade law, globalization, dispute settlement, WTO dispute settlement, WTO dispute resolution, World Trade Organization, Varietals, Appellate Body, WTO Appellate Body, Sanitary, Phytosanitary, trade disputes
JEL Classification: F1, K33Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: April 18, 2006
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.266 seconds