Brain Overclaim Syndrome and Criminal Responsibility: A Diagnostic Note
University of Pennsylvania Law School
Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, Vol. 3, p. 397, 2006
U of Penn Law School, Public Law Working Paper No. 06-35
This brief diagnostic note identifies a cognitive pathology, Brain Overclaim Syndrome [BOS], that often afflicts those inflamed by the fascinating new discoveries in the neurosciences. It begins by suggesting how one should think about the relation of neuroscience (or any other material explanation of human behavior) to criminal responsibility, distinguishing between internal and external critiques based on neuroscience. It then describes the signs and symptoms of BOS, the essential feature of which is to make claims about the implications of neuroscience for criminal responsibility that cannot be conceptually or empirically sustained. It then applies the diagnostic lens of BOS to the claims in Roper v. Simmons. Finally, the article recommends Cognitive Jurotherapy [CJ] as the therapy of choice for BOS.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 17
Keywords: Brain Overclaim Syndrome, neuroscience, criminal responsibility, Roper v. Simmons, Cognitive JurotherapyAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: April 13, 2006
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.422 seconds