Overhearing Part of a Conversation: Shutts as a Moment in a Long Dialogue
Stephen C. Yeazell
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law
April 17, 2006
UCLA School of Law Research Paper No. 06-19
Phillips Petroleum v. Shutts, the topic of a recent symposium, looks backwards as well as forwards. In its backwards-looking aspect Shutts suggests what federal diversity jurisdiction might have become. In its forward-looking aspect Shutts suggests the problems that will arise under the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005. This essay uses Shutts to sketch a new role for diversity jurisdiction, and it uses Shutts' facts to explain how we might begin to resolve the issues that CAFA will create.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 19
Keywords: Shutts, class actions, choice of law, diversity jurisdiction
JEL Classification: K20, K41working papers series
Date posted: April 22, 2006
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.250 seconds