Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=897384
 
 

Footnotes (97)



 


 



Overhearing Part of a Conversation: Shutts as a Moment in a Long Dialogue


Stephen C. Yeazell


University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law

April 17, 2006

UCLA School of Law Research Paper No. 06-19

Abstract:     
Phillips Petroleum v. Shutts, the topic of a recent symposium, looks backwards as well as forwards. In its backwards-looking aspect Shutts suggests what federal diversity jurisdiction might have become. In its forward-looking aspect Shutts suggests the problems that will arise under the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005. This essay uses Shutts to sketch a new role for diversity jurisdiction, and it uses Shutts' facts to explain how we might begin to resolve the issues that CAFA will create.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 19

Keywords: Shutts, class actions, choice of law, diversity jurisdiction

JEL Classification: K20, K41

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 22, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Yeazell, Stephen C., Overhearing Part of a Conversation: Shutts as a Moment in a Long Dialogue (April 17, 2006). UCLA School of Law Research Paper No. 06-19. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=897384 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.897384

Contact Information

Stephen Yeazell (Contact Author)
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law ( email )
405 Hilgard Avenue
Box 951476 P.O. Box 951476
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1476
United States
310-825-8404 (Phone)
310-206-0158 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,415
Downloads: 127
Download Rank: 130,105
Footnotes:  97

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.282 seconds