Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=897708
 
 

References (38)



 
 

Citations (10)



 


 



The As-Is Journal Review Process: Let Authors Own Their Ideas


Bruno S. Frey


CREMA; Zeppelin University

Eric W. K. Tsang


Nanyang Technological University (NTU) - Nanyang Business School

April 2006

IEW Working Paper No. 280

Abstract:     
Recently, the problems associated with the existing journal review process aroused discussions from seasoned management researchers, who have also made useful suggestions for improving the process. To complement these suggestions, we propose a more radical change: a manuscript should be reviewed on an as is basis and its fate be determined in one round of review. The as-is review process shortens the time period from submission to final acceptance, reduces the workload of editors, referees and authors, provides frank author feedback to referees, and, most important, lets authors own all of the ideas in their publications.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 24

Keywords: Journals, reviews, authors, submissions

JEL Classification: Z0

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 27, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Frey, Bruno S. and Tsang, Eric W. K., The As-Is Journal Review Process: Let Authors Own Their Ideas (April 2006). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=897708 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.897708

Contact Information

Bruno S. Frey (Contact Author)
CREMA ( email )
Südstrasse 11
Zurich, CH 8008
Switzerland
Zeppelin University ( email )
Am Seemooser Horn 20
Friedrichshafen, Lake Constance 88045
Germany
Eric W. K. Tsang
Nanyang Technological University (NTU) - Nanyang Business School ( email )
Mailbox No. BIA-08
Singapore 639798
Singapore
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,125
Downloads: 157
Download Rank: 108,727
References:  38
Citations:  10

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.265 seconds