SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (255)

Beta

 


 



Judicial Recusal and Disqualification: The Need for a Per Se Rule on Friendship (Not Acquaintance)

Jeremy M. Miller
Chapman University - School of Law



Pepperdine Law Review, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 575-614, 2006

Abstract:     
Legal Ethics rules have become both more objective and more specific. There are already enemy rules for recusal. The recent debacle of the Antonin Scalia/Dick Cheney hunting trip when VP Cheney was a named defendant, and Scalia's refusal to disqualify himself shows there is a problem. But Scalia was correct, friendship does not mandate recusal. However, friendship, properly defined, as herein, must be added to the recusal factors. Former Chief Justice Rehnquist refusing to disqualify himself when he was involved in a lower court case as prosecutor caused an analogous change in the judicial conduct rules. This paper traces case law, defines friendship, and gives examples of the effect of a clearly drafted friendship recusal rule.

Accepted Paper Series

Date posted: May 03, 2006 ; Last revised: August 20, 2008

Suggested Citation

Miller, Jeremy M., Judicial Recusal and Disqualification: The Need for a Per Se Rule on Friendship (Not Acquaintance). Pepperdine Law Review, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 575-614, 2006. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=898101


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Jeremy M. Miller (Contact Author)
Chapman University - School of Law ( email )
One University Drive
Orange, CA 92866-1099
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 395
Downloads: 35
Footnotes: 255

© 2010 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was served by apollo6 in 0.203 seconds.